There is a saying“if I had a pound for every time I was asked …” This is one question that many patients ask at some point during their course of treatment, and I look forward to referring them to our blog for answers from now on!
I will try to answer this without bias but please note that I am an osteopath and therefore cannot be truly objective. It is worth noting that as an aspiring health practitioner, I did consider all three, but chose osteopathy from some specific reasons that are still valid in my eyes today.
Osteopathy
is a holistic form of manual therapy, which deals with a wide range of acute, chronic and systemic disorders of the body, both musculoskeletal and visceral.
Osteopathy uses in-depth physiological and clinical knowledge, coupled with keen observation and palpatory skills. The osteopath will combine a detailed health case history with a thorough physical evaluation to diagnose the patient’s condition and treat it. The patient’s diet, work, and leisure practices all inform this process.
The osteopath doesn’t treat a painful back, stomach or knee, but a body as a whole unit that is suffering an injury, and must be treated in an integrated manner to return to good balance and function: can an injured knee be treated conclusively without addressing the biomechanics of the ankle, hip, pelvis and back? The osteopath’s aim is not merely symptomatic relief, but addressing the underlying causes of the current presentation to prevent any re-occurrence.
The osteopathic treatment combines joint mobilisation – and occasionally manipulation – with work on muscles and ligament tension, as well as gentle work on visceral structures when required.
As
naturopathic osteopaths, our specific bias is not merely to achieve better functional alignment of our patients’ bodies, but also to impart dietary, exercise and lifestyle advice that more generally enhance their long-term health.
Chiropractic
The origins of Chiropractic
are close to osteopathy, as the first chiropractor was a student of the founder of osteopathy. Indeed, in some instances, one would be hard-pressed to distinguish between the treatment provided by a good chiropractor and osteopath. However, a large proportion of chiropractors focus treatment on the manipulation of spinal segments to normalise spinal position and effect underlying nerve roots.
Treatment plans are often based on regular manipulation for a set number of sessions in order to wholly correct a disorder. Chiropractors also often use imaging to aid diagnosis such as x-ray. These x-rays will often be conducted in the clinic as part of the course of treatment.
Physiotherapy
is the most commonly known form of ‘manual therapy’ due to its prevalence within the NHS.
Physiotherapists specialise in the rehabilitation of acute and chronic joint injury, often using a variety of prescribed exercises that the patient carries out when away from the treatment couch. Physios also use machines such as ultrasound or TENS machines to facilitate change in an injured area.
NHS Physiotherapists tend not to have diagnostic input, the diagnosis and treatment request tending to emanate from an orthopaedic surgeon, consultant rheumatologist etc. As a result, treatment will also tend to be more specific than integrative.
Inevitably, this brief snapshot doesn’t do justice to the development of three different forms of manual therapy with their unique methods and philosophy. It merely attempts to highlight some of the key differences in clinical practice that you can expect from each – although as suggested above, the practice of some physios and chiropractors is sufficiently all encompassing as to be well aligned with osteopathic practice.
Sadly too, some osteopaths also stray into being too specific in their form of treatment, and come to rely too heavily on joint manipulation.
---------
Original sources:
NOVEMBER 5, 2008 BY MATHIEU
Read also:
